How to Get Private Lenders & Lines of Credit to Fund Your Business

Everyone’s worried.  The media and candidates are having a field day blaming their favorite scapegoat.  Should we fire bank CEO’s? Should we nationalize banks? And how can we “Make sure this never happens again?”

Congress wants to make laws (of course) with more stringent regulations (that will probably only screw the small investor).  So, let’s take a step back and take an objective view of how this problem developed.

Craig Nichols wrote me last month with a very perceptive comment about the “mortgage meltdown:  “The banks were fulfilling a mandate of Congress. Congress caused this mess. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1995 was revised/written to relax the underwriting standards, so that more people could qualify for loans to purchase houses.”

Let’s follow the trail from here. 

First, let’s understand, banks like insurance companies lend money (or write policies) based on a mathematical assessment of risk - it’s called underwriting.  For banks, based on credit score, debt to income ratio and other parameters, the lender can decide to whom and how much to lend to keep defaults (losing the investor’s money) to a minimum. 

Congress of course failed to understand this (or more likely ignored this) so they could get a social pat on the back from constituents who could now buy homes.

Now we get to the next disconnect.  The banks certainly knew the consequences of “relaxing their underwriting standards”.  However, with a mandate and pressure from Congress and the opportunity to make literally Billions in more revenue, the entire system of checks and balances was subverted.

Qualification requirements were certainly relaxed, but this is not what caused the major damage.    To really open the revenue floodgates that the banks’ shareholders were now expecting, the banks had to vastly expand the pool of available homebuyers.  They did this with the indiscriminate use of  ”no doc”, “stated income” and “adjustable rate mortgages (ARM)”. 

“No doc” and “stated income” allowed borrowers with decent credit scores to lie about their income.  Thus, allowing many who clearly would not qualify based on their ability to make the mortgage payments to get loans. 

The ARM’s gamed the underwriting system, since qualification was based on the income needed to make the payments on the abnormally low first 6 mo or 1 year “teaser rate”.   These rates got so ridiculous that homebuyers making $30,000 a year were qualifying to buy $500,000 homes!

But, the real killer with the ARM was, that when the rate re-adjusted, to a higher than average interest rate, default was virtually inevitable.  And this sowed the seeds for the enormous disaster that has come to pass.

So, how did the stock market become involved.  Well, most banks do not hold the mortgage notes they lend on.  They package these notes into “Mortgage Backed Securities” (MBS) and sell them to Wall St with the help of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae - 2 semi-private (until now) corporations. 

 Now, these 2 corporations (probably also motivated by greed) did something that was financially unconscionable and unethical.  They packaged and sold these loans to Wall St as if they were “A” paper with investors paying premium pricing, for loans that were very likely to go into default.  That paper was actually worse than “sub-prime” because the possibility of default was almost certain.  I doubt Wall St would have bought these loans or at least downgraded them to junk bonds, if they knew the real risk.

So, when the foreclosures started mounting, everyone from the banks to the big Wall St brokerages houses went down, precipitating a worldwide financial crisis.  

Personally, I don’t know how to fix this.  It is certainly unclear whether the 100’s of billions of dollars are going to make a difference or even the right difference.  However, do have a suggestion to help avoid having this type of thing happen again.

First, we don’t need more regulations.  It wasn’t the banks that started this, it was Congress who made a bad law, whose consequences they didn’t forsee or chose to ignore.  After that, the profit motive, greed and human nature (none of which is going to change) took over.

So, what can we do, to protect us from our lawmakers.  In the Constitution, we have checks and balances.  An executive branch has the power veto, and the judiciary has power to strike down bad laws (after the fact).

What we need is a separate branch of government that can quash bad laws or laws with serious “unintended” consequences before everyone suffers.  So, let’s set up a new branch of government - the Oversight of Unintended Consequences”.  A branch that would be free political considerations and could point out to the American people and Congress the serious repercussions of ill-thought out laws and regulations.  Perhaps, there could a sort of “legal underwriting”  that could assign a “threat score” to any proposed regulation.  Only proposals with a threat score under a certain threshold would be eligible to become law.

What we have now is the consequence of a very bad law, that took 13 years to threaten total financial meltdown.  And by the way, even if the 700 billion solves the problem, it’s a cost that is coming out of our pockets, and is weaking the economic strength of our country. 

And how many other “bad laws” are going to have very unpleasant consequences that we have not yet forseen.  We have the intellectual resources and technology to make such forecasting a reality.  Maybe we should consider it before the next disaster overtakes us.

Posted to Buyer Financing, Institutional Lending, Money & the World, Uncategorized
 Email This Post | Comments(0)

I got this response from Craig Nichols to one of my posts:

“In your email message, you made the following statement ‘the mortgage mortgage meltdown which was caused by greedy banks, ripping off the Wall St investors’.  The banks were fulfilling a mandate of Congress. Congress caused this mess. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1995 was revised/written to relax the underwriting standards, so that more people could qualify for loans to purchase houses.”

Craig, I agree that whenever Congress passes any law, there are usually “unintended consequences” that usually do more harm than good.  So, the less Congress does, the better.

And, in the case of the mortgage meltdown, what brought the situation to the “tipping point” was not simply relaxing underwriting standards.  A chief culprit was collusion by the banks in how they decided to underwrite ARM’s (adjustable rate mortgages). 

In particular, as most readers know, an adjustable rate mortgage starts out with some really low interest “teaser rate”.  Sometimes the rate is also interest only which lowers the monthly payments enormously.  Now, if the loan underwriters use this low introductory monthly payment to qualify potential borrowers, you get borrowers who only earn say $30K/y qualifying to buy $300,000 to $500,000 homes. 

Of course when the rate re-adjusts in 1 to 5 years, the interest rate jumps to double digits, and starts to amortize.  a $750 monthly payment jumps to almost $3300 which is more than their entire salary.  Obviously, foreclosure is inevitable.  This is now the fate of 100,000’s of homeowners.

And as I mentioned in my last post, the “Economic Recovery Act” just passed by Congress does nothing to address the problem.  It’s simply a hand out to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

What really has to happen is that the banks need to loosen their credit policies and only surgically correct those practices that got them in trouble in the first place–e.g., the underwriting of ARM’s and stated income loans. 

Maybe this is something we can write our congress-people about.

Posted to Business Lines of Credit, Buyer Financing, Money & the World
 Email This Post | Comments(0)

This may sound a bit presumptuous.  And after investing in all levels of real estate for the last 10 years, I believe these insights will be very helpful to the general public suffering from the tightening of credit guidelines and especially our legislators, who could really stimulate the economy by acting on the suggestions in this article.

First, let’s be clear, that the “credit crisis” or “mortgage meltdown” was caused by institutional lenders gaming their own underwriting system by the way they approved adjustable rate mortgages or ARM’s.

You see, one of the primary determinants of whether a borrower gets approved for a mortgage is whether the borrower can afford to make the monthly payments, which in turn depends on income, debt payments and the amount of the monthly payments.  With fixed rate mortgages, the monthly payment is the same from the first payment to the last.  With ARM’s there’s a very low “teaser” rate for the 1st 6mos to 2 yrs, then the rate jumps enormously. 

So, when the banks decided to qualify the borrower based on the “teaser” rate, you had a situation where couples earning as little as $30,000 per year were qualifying to buy a half million dollar house!  Of course, when the rate adjusted, the monthly payment became almost as much as their monthly take home pay and foreclosure was inevitable.

The banks initially got away with this sleight-of-hand, because all these loans were packaged and sold to Wall St, before they defaulted.  It was the “meltdown” of these mortgage-backed securities that threw the market into turmoil.

The banks, decided to look like they were acting more responsibly by “tightening their credit requirements” across the board - basically making much, much harder for individuals, businesses and other credit suppliers to obtain loans.

Predictably, all this did was turn a problem into a huge crisis that is hurting the entire economy, and in particular is actually worsening the problem, the banks need to solve.  That problem is the accumulation of billions of dollars of foreclosed homes in the banks’ inventory–also known as non-performing assets.

Why did the credit tightening worsen the foreclosure issue? Because the only way to get rid of the banks’ inventory is to sell the property.  The tightened credit requirements have greatly shrunk the potential buyer pool for these properties.  And if you think about it, the foreclosures were and are being caused by lack of borrower income to pay the note, not their credit score!

So, what’s the solution that will get all these foreclosed homes off the banks’ books, and return the property to homeowners and relieve the burden on the economy.  It’s not going to be a government bail out, or the ludicrous Economic Stimulus Act, which is just a hand out to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

What needs to be done, is for the banks to sell the properties they’ve accumulated at a sufficient discount so that investors will buy, fix them up, and then sell them to ender users.  Investors are, and have been a massive source of private money for this type of real estate acquisition.  And this is a common practice at most banks that has been going on for years. 

Now, what needs to be done, is that banks need to instruct their Loss Mitigators to sell these properties at whatever discounted price it takes.  And Corporate Management should incentivize them by giving them bonuses based on the number of properties sold.

Second, the banks need to roll back their credit requirements to the pre-2008 standards and tighten up the underwriting of ARM mortgages so that the adjusted payment (based on current interest rates) is used in the calculation of the debt ratio.

Why should the banks agree to do this?  First, they’ve written off these loans already.  Second, divesting themselves of these non-performing assets will increase their borrowing power.  Third, they are not going to recover any amount of their investment any other way, because these unoccupied homes are rapidly declining in value due to vandalism, and neglect.

This is a Perfect Solution, because it would remove the non-performing assets from the lender’s books and restore them to solvency.  Second, loosening up the credit requirements (which did not cause the problem in the first place), would stimulate commerce, and loan approvals which would increase the banks’ income.

And Best of All, it would stimulate the economy by restoring credit availability without costing the government or taxpayers a dime!

Posted to Business Lines of Credit, Buyer Financing, Institutional Lending, Money & the World, Uncategorized
 Email This Post | Comments(1)

You may have heard, the President signed the “Economic Stimulus Act of 2008″ into law.  Basically, it’s a big hand out to Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.  The Banks that caused the whole mortgage meltdown in the first place, are also likely to scoop up some of the cash.

But how will it affect us investors, let alone the homeowners?

Well, for starters, homeowners are still screwed.  You see, the act allows Fannie Mae to underwite mortgages to a higher amount, and it raises the limit for FHA loans requiring a 3% down payment.  Sounds, great, right? 

But think about it?  If you’re selling home and requiring your buyer to obtain financing, what is the major challenge?  It’s not the down payment or the limit on the loan amount–it’s the buyer’s credit qualification.  And as you are probably aware, banks have raised the bar considerably.  The minimum credit score is much higher, stated income loans and no doc loans are virtually non-existent, debt-to-income ratios are lower.  That has pretty much eliminated a large chunk of the buyer pool.

So, selling to owner-occupying buyers is going to remain difficult, and if your potential buyer has to sell their current residence before they can buy yours- well… Let’s just say I would NOT advise a seller to allow a financing contingency in the purchase and sale agreement.

Now, how about another benign sounding provision–a hand out to cities and towns with high foreclosure rates to buy up REO’s, fix them and sell them.  It’s obvious, that if you are an investor competing against one of those grants, your out of luck.  Banks of course, are going to benefit, because they’ll be able recoup practically all their costs on these bad loans, with free money.

And what else will happen?  These grants are going to depress property values in any area they are used.  Why, because the government entity is going to be motivated “as a public service” to sell these houses cheap, so more of their residents can own the American dream.  If you’re in the real estate buying mode, wait for the drop before you buy.  If you’re in the selling mode, you are just going to have to wait even longer to cash out your equity.  Be sure you have a positive cashflow, because you’re going to be waiting for quite a while.

So, as usual, the government has meddled with the economy using our tax money, to support the big campaign donors - the banks and the mortgage establishment.  Everybody else, is just SOL.

The solution to the housing crisis is one heck of a lot simpler and straightforward.  To slow down the foreclosure firestorm, give all homeowners with adjustable mortgages the right to negotiate loan modifications to convert to fixed rate, retroactive to the beginning of first adjustment period.

Second, and most importantly, is get the lending institutions to roll back, some of their stiff borrowing requirements.  The lending criteria were not unsound in the first place.  It was the banks own underwriting sleight-of-hand, that caused the crisis.  Because, they allowed the borrower to qualify for the mortgage based on the artificially lowered 1st year (or 6mos or 2y) payment, instead of the rate when the loan readjusted.  This allowed them to collect big loan origination fees from people who couldn’t possibly afford to pay the mortage payments once they adjusted.

Of course, to implement this, banks would have to admit to their greed and avarice that caused the problem.  That ain’t gonna happen.  Speak about “truth in lending”! Ha.

Posted to Buyer Financing, Institutional Lending, Money & the World
 Email This Post | Comments(0)

I’ve gotten a number of comments about my “Show Me the Money” Manual.  And I wanted to take the opportunity here to respond to them.

First of all, this manual is not just for experienced investors.  In fact, most of the techniques I teach in the manual work great even if you are a rank beginner.  For example, buyer and seller financing, private lending with family and friends, unsecured business lines of credit, equity exchange… In fact the only areas where a beginner will have a significant learning curve is with commercial loans, and million dollar funding.

Secondly, don’t let the low price decieve you.  This is not just a teaser, that requires you to buy something else, in order to do anything worthwhile.  Anybody, can follow the procedures I describe and be successful in having funds for real estate purchases.

So, if you want to own this one-of-a-kind deal funding manual, click on the “Show Me the Money” icon on this page or Use This Link Now.

For beginners with good credit I recommend you Immediately read the chapter on getting unsecured business lines of credit, and take action.  You could have access to hundreds of thousands of dollars in a matter of months.

Posted to Business Lines of Credit, Buyer Financing, Friends & Family, Private Lending
 Email This Post | Comments(0)

I was reading an article on senior housing.  The slow housing market has delayed the plans of seniors who want to move to an independent-type retirement community but who can’t sell their homes. It’s not so great an issue for senior care facilities since the move to them is more out of necessity.

Now, what about your buyer?  Does he or she have to sell their house in order to buy yours?  If you have a financing contingency in your purchase and sale agreement, you are opening yourself up to be held hostage by the entire housing market. This is not smart.  Instead you should charge an earnest money fee equal to the amount to cover your payments and then some over the time of the contract.  And you hold the earnest money!

However, because of the tightening of the credit markets, foreclosures and the general decline in home values, you need to have your exit strategy (the one that will make you money, despite the challenges), BEFORE you buy.  It could be flipping to other investors, offering owner financing, down payment assistance, rental, etc.  Whatever you do, make sure you have realistic (below market) numbers for rent or sale prices, and realistic holding times.  If you still calculate your makiig a profit, go for it.  If not, renegotiate terms, or pass.

Remember one bad deal can negate the profit from 5 good deals, or take you out of the game entirely.  So, don’t let anxiety or greed motivate you to make risky choices.  Believe me, it is not worth it.

If you want to learn all of our strategies for dealing with buyers (or renters) including finding them, negotiating and funding them, you need to join our Foreclosure Millionaire Club.  You can try it for just a buck.  Click here to Join.

Posted to Buyer Financing, Institutional Lending, Uncategorized
 Email This Post | Comments(1)

Sherril wrote a comment on my previous article of “private lending - the best times are the worst times”, saying that us investors will just have to wait until the market becomes more positive.  Well,
I don’t like the idea of waiting til the market does something.  Rather let’s respond creatively to the current market negativity to make some money.

First, let’s recognize that the truth is that home values a falling in many areas of the country.  This is definitely not good for people who want to sell their home.  Despite the fact that this particular downturn has been triggered by the adjustable mortgage debacle, it is really just part of the cycle of real estate values that occurs with a period of 8-15 years.  We’ve been in a up cycle so long, most investors haven’t a experienced a down period.  And values will eventually come up again.

But what is the investor supposed to do now?  First, let’s go back to the first principle I believe every investor should live by: “You make your money when you buy”  This means that your profit is built into the price and terms of the offer your willing to accept.

For example, if you are flipping houses, start with the calculation of what your investor buyers are willing to pay for these properties.  It may still be 70% of after repair value (ARV) - repairs, but what is the percieved ARV? 

In a falling market comps are deceptive.  They are a backward looking measure of value, of people were paying for similar properties 6 mos to 1 year ago.  The trick is to be able to project with some safety margin how low the price will be 6 mos to a year from now!    In some places the depreciation rate is 5%.  The percieved depreciation rate of your potential buyers may be higher.  And that’s the real value of the ARV.

Start with that value, factor in your costs and profit, and you’ll get the maximum about you can offer to pay your seller. 

By the way, if you want to know how to fund every deal you do, I’ve created the absolute best and most comprehensive funding manual you will ever see called “Show Me the Money“.  It contains step by step instructions on how to get money from private lenders, high net worth individuals, lines of credit, financial institutions, buyers, sellers, notes, and much, much more.   And, it’s a ridiculously low investment (for now!).  Click here and Get in NOW.

Posted to Buyer Financing, Marketing in Real Estate, Uncategorized
 Email This Post | Comments(0)